SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If you heard rumours or insight about who your team might draft comment

Created by: csick
Team: 2023-24 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: May 9, 2024
Published: May 9, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
OTT
    Is it gonna be Demidov or Levshunov?
    CHI
    2.
    OTT
      Is it gonna be Levshunov if he falls to 3 , or one of Demidov/Lindstrom
      ANA
      3.
      OTT
        Is it gonna be Lindstrom if he falls to 4 or Silayev?
        CBJ
        4.
        OTT
          Is it gonna be Lindstrom if he falls to 5.
          If not , is it Iginla or Sennecke ?
          MTL
          5.
          OTT
            Is it gonna be Buium, Silayev , Parekh, Dickinson or Iginla?
            ARI
            Buyouts
            Retained Salary Transactions
            DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
            2024
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the BOS
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the DET
            Logo of the FLA
            Logo of the TBL
            Logo of the OTT
            2025
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the FLA
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            2026
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            Logo of the OTT
            ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
            21$83,500,000$74,550,713$0$1,850,000$8,949,287
            Left WingCentreRight Wing
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $8,205,714$8,205,714
            LW
            UFA - 5
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $8,350,000$8,350,000
            C
            UFA - 8
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $6,500,000$6,500,000
            RW, C
            NMC
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $2,950,000$2,950,000
            LW, RW
            UFA - 3
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $863,333$863,333
            C, LW
            RFA - 2
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $4,975,000$4,975,000
            RW, LW
            UFA - 4
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $2,500,000$2,500,000
            LW, RW
            UFA - 1
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $835,000$835,000
            C, RW
            RFA - 2
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $775,000$775,000
            RW, C
            UFA - 3
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $762,500$762,500
            LW
            RFA - 1
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $775,000$775,000
            C
            RFA - 1
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $758,333$758,333
            LW
            RFA - 1
            Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $8,000,000$8,000,000
            LD
            UFA - 5
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $4,600,000$4,600,000
            RD
            M-NTC
            UFA - 4
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $4,000,000$4,000,000
            G
            M-NTC
            UFA - 5
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $4,600,000$4,600,000
            LD/RD
            M-NTC
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $1,100,000$1,100,000
            RD
            NMC
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $2,750,000$2,750,000
            G
            UFA - 2
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $2,000,000$2,000,000
            LD/RD, LW
            RFA - 1
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $805,000$805,000
            RD
            RFA - 2
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
            LD
            UFA - 1
            ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
            Logo of the Ottawa Senators
            $7,950,000$7,950,000
            C
            UFA - 7

            Embed Code

            • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
            • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

            Text-Embed

            Click to Highlight
            May 9 at 8:52 p.m.
            #1
            Future Ducks legend
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 10,469
            Likes: 7,270
            I got a feeling it's going to be Parekh, maybe even if Leshunov is on the board
            May 9 at 8:53 p.m.
            #2
            sharcuda22
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Apr. 2022
            Posts: 1,845
            Likes: 579
            Celebrini for us me thinks
            May 9 at 8:55 p.m.
            #3
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2021
            Posts: 16,294
            Likes: 12,558
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            I got a feeling it's going to be Parekh, maybe even if Leshunov is on the board


            Why’s that?

            Quoting: sharcuda22
            Celebrini for us me thinks


            Good thing it wasn’t Chicago
            sharcuda22 liked this.
            May 9 at 8:56 p.m.
            #4
            sharcuda22
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Apr. 2022
            Posts: 1,845
            Likes: 579
            Quoting: GeneralLandro
            Why’s that?



            Good thing it wasn’t Chicago


            Thanks for being a good sport, sharks fans needed a win since we certainly dont get any on the ice :’)
            GeneralLandro, squashmaple, csick and 1 other person liked this.
            May 9 at 9:00 p.m.
            #5
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            I got a feeling it's going to be Parekh, maybe even if Leshunov is on the board


            Bad move. Hes not a fit next to Zellweger or Mintyukov
            May 9 at 9:00 p.m.
            #6
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: sharcuda22
            Celebrini for us me thinks


            I skipped u guys on purpose 🤣
            CaseyFlyman and sharcuda22 liked this.
            May 9 at 9:01 p.m.
            #7
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: GeneralLandro
            Why’s that?



            Good thing it wasn’t Chicago


            Honestly I think it’s gonna be Levshunov or Demidov. Verbeek said he’s looking for right shot RW and right shot D. Whoever drops of the 2 to 3 , he will take.
            GeneralLandro liked this.
            May 9 at 9:02 p.m.
            #8
            not a he )
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Apr. 2022
            Posts: 3,455
            Likes: 4,826
            Silayev is the only one Columbus has specifically been linked to so far, but I’d personally be happy with any of the above. I also really like Helenius. Columbus doesn’t have a glaring need so they have the luxury of taking their BPA, whether it’s one of those or someone else.
            csick and CaseyFlyman liked this.
            May 9 at 9:03 p.m.
            #9
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: squashmaple
            Silayev is the only one Columbus has specifically been linked to so far, but I’d personally be happy with any of the above. I also really like Helenius. Columbus doesn’t have a glaring need so they have the luxury of taking their BPA, whether it’s one of those or someone else.


            I’m not betting on it but I have heard some Helenius buzz in the 3-4 range too. I don’t think it’s strong enough to be like the favourite but I think he’s under consideration there
            squashmaple and CaseyFlyman liked this.
            May 9 at 9:04 p.m.
            #10
            Future Ducks legend
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 10,469
            Likes: 7,270
            Quoting: csick
            Honestly I think it’s gonna be Levshunov or Demidov. Verbeek said he’s looking for right shot RW and right shot D. Whoever drops of the 2 to 3 , he will take.


            Demidov is left shot, undersized, and a playmaker, Verbeeks not taking him.
            GeneralLandro liked this.
            May 9 at 9:07 p.m.
            #11
            not a he )
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Apr. 2022
            Posts: 3,455
            Likes: 4,826
            Quoting: csick
            I’m not betting on it but I have heard some Helenius buzz in the 3-4 range too. I don’t think it’s strong enough to be like the favourite but I think he’s under consideration there


            Also it might be beneficial to everyone involved to trade down a few slots, take Helenius, and see what he and Laine can do together.
            May 9 at 9:14 p.m.
            #12
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Feb. 2019
            Posts: 15,961
            Likes: 8,585
            Chicago - I think the right pick for them should be Levshunov. They have their cornerstone centre, and you need an elite C and an elite RD to fully kickstart a rebuild. If not him them it's Lindstrom; their forward core in the future is very small.

            Anaheim - If the Hawks take Levshunov, my opinion is that the right pick for them is Demidov to play in their top six. However, they're looking for a top-six right shot F and a top-4 right shot D. I think it'll just end up being that they take Silayev to complement Zellweger or Mintyukov - someone can play right side.

            Columbus - They're probably gonna take a centre with this pick in my opinion. They have an elite C in Fantilli if they don't mess up his development, and Kent Johnson isn't a centre -- probably a LW -- so they'll need a centreman. Lindstrom is their pick here. However, if for some reason they don't want him, they need to take a different forward or a two way defenseman (Dickinson?)

            Montreal - I hope Demidov falls to us. It'll be a dream - but I don't know if that's happening. That being said, we're probably either going to take Iginla/Catton, or trade down (maybe with CGY?) to still get the same guy, but avoid reaching on them
            csick and benjgc liked this.
            May 9 at 9:14 p.m.
            #13
            Future Ducks legend
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 10,469
            Likes: 7,270
            Quoting: csick
            Bad move. Hes not a fit next to Zellweger or Mintyukov


            Parekh literally played with Mintyukov last year in Saginaw on the same line.
            StutzlesNumber1Fan, Jded, squashmaple and 2 others liked this.
            May 9 at 9:25 p.m.
            #14
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            Parekh literally played with Mintyukov last year in Saginaw on the same line.


            That’s the OHL . In the NHL it’s not good enough
            May 9 at 9:29 p.m.
            #15
            Future Ducks legend
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 10,469
            Likes: 7,270
            Quoting: csick
            That’s the OHL . In the NHL it’s not good enough


            And I wouldn't be so sure that Zellweger is a top 4 lock if I were you. They were trying him out at wing in San Diego too.
            May 9 at 9:33 p.m.
            #16
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            And I wouldn't be so sure that Zellweger is a top 4 lock if I were you. They were trying him out at wing in San Diego too.


            If that’s the case they take Silayev
            May 9 at 9:46 p.m.
            #17
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 3,019
            Likes: 2,026
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            And I wouldn't be so sure that Zellweger is a top 4 lock if I were you. They were trying him out at wing in San Diego too.


            My man there like nooo way he transitions to wing at this stage. And compared to other guys with exceptional transition skills like Makar and Fox, he really isn’t very different in terms of size

            Imo the most likely picks for ANA are: Levshunov, Lindstrom, Demidov, Silayev. I feel like this is a draft where I can picture them moving back though. Guys like Parekh, Yakemchuk, Helenius, MBN, Iginla all fit the Verbeek mold well
            csick liked this.
            May 9 at 9:51 p.m.
            #18
            Future Ducks legend
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 10,469
            Likes: 7,270
            Quoting: Jded
            My man there like nooo way he transitions to wing at this stage. And compared to other guys with exceptional transition skills like Makar and Fox, he really isn’t very different in terms of size

            Imo the most likely picks for ANA are: Levshunov, Lindstrom, Demidov, Silayev. I feel like this is a draft where I can picture them moving back though. Guys like Parekh, Yakemchuk, Helenius, MBN, Iginla all fit the Verbeek mold well


            Chicagos going Lindstrom for their future 2C, we take Parekh at 3, Columbus takes Silayev 4, Montreal grabs Demidov at 5, Utah takes Eiserman at 6, and Ottawa takes Levshunov at 7.
            csick and Boodin liked this.
            May 9 at 9:58 p.m.
            #19
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            Chicagos going Lindstrom for their future 2C, we take Parekh at 3, Columbus takes Silayev 4, Montreal grabs Demidov at 5, Utah takes Eiserman at 6, and Ottawa takes Levshunov at 7.


            I’d be good with that as a Sens fan
            Boodin liked this.
            May 9 at 10:32 p.m.
            #20
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 3,019
            Likes: 2,026
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            Chicagos going Lindstrom for their future 2C, we take Parekh at 3, Columbus takes Silayev 4, Montreal grabs Demidov at 5, Utah takes Eiserman at 6, and Ottawa takes Levshunov at 7.


            Bolddddd. I really just can’t picture Verbeek passing on a 6’3 210lb RHD that can skate though
            May 9 at 11:03 p.m.
            #21
            Future Ducks legend
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 10,469
            Likes: 7,270
            Quoting: Jded
            Bolddddd. I really just can’t picture Verbeek passing on a 6’3 210lb RHD that can skate though


            I'm reading more and more issues with consistency, read, and IQ.

            He's toolsy, sure, but so was Drysdale. One thing that's been real constant across all Verbeeks higher picks, and some of his minor trade acquisitions, has been high hockey IQ. Levshunov doesn't have it, Parekh does.
            May 10 at 12:53 a.m.
            #22
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 3,019
            Likes: 2,026
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            I'm reading more and more issues with consistency, read, and IQ.

            He's toolsy, sure, but so was Drysdale. One thing that's been real constant across all Verbeeks higher picks, and some of his minor trade acquisitions, has been high hockey IQ. Levshunov doesn't have it, Parekh does.


            Drys was moved because of size, not IQ. Tough to ice both Zellweger and Drysdale in the same top 4

            I do also find it a bit hard to believe he has poor hockey sense putting up a point per game as a freshman in D1 NCAA
            csick and StutzlesNumber1Fan liked this.
            May 10 at 1:03 a.m.
            #23
            Future Ducks legend
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2022
            Posts: 10,469
            Likes: 7,270
            Quoting: Jded
            Drys was moved because of size, not IQ. Tough to ice both Zellweger and Drysdale in the same top 4

            I do also find it a bit hard to believe he has poor hockey sense putting up a point per game as a freshman in D1 NCAA


            I think size was part of it, I think Durability, or lack there of, was the biggest issue, but I also think that Drysdale wasn't adapting to being a regular defenseman well and without Lindholm, he couldn't be a Rover. He was constantly making bad plays in his own end and coughing up the puck for bad turnovers.

            He was toolsy, but he was never putting all the pieces together.

            I dunno, I guess we'll see come draft time, but Anaheims gone back to the well a few times with the Saginaw Spirit, I wouldn't be surprised if it's Parekh at 3.
            May 10 at 1:07 a.m.
            #24
            Thread Starter
            KFTW
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jul. 2018
            Posts: 44,375
            Likes: 25,056
            Quoting: Jded
            Drys was moved because of size, not IQ. Tough to ice both Zellweger and Drysdale in the same top 4

            I do also find it a bit hard to believe he has poor hockey sense putting up a point per game as a freshman in D1 NCAA


            If he traded Drysdale because of fit, hes not gonna draft Parekh
            May 10 at 9:00 a.m.
            #25
            Avatar of the user
            Joined: Jun. 2016
            Posts: 3,019
            Likes: 2,026
            Quoting: GiggywithGibby
            I think size was part of it, I think Durability, or lack there of, was the biggest issue, but I also think that Drysdale wasn't adapting to being a regular defenseman well and without Lindholm, he couldn't be a Rover. He was constantly making bad plays in his own end and coughing up the puck for bad turnovers.

            He was toolsy, but he was never putting all the pieces together.

            I dunno, I guess we'll see come draft time, but Anaheims gone back to the well a few times with the Saginaw Spirit, I wouldn't be surprised if it's Parekh at 3.


            If gameplay in our own end is an issue, Parekh has far more red flags than Levshunov if we’re being honest. Especially off the puck. And if either of these two was to be compared to Drys, I feel like it’d have to be Parekh

            I would pray that they don’t take a guy at 3OA just because they’re familiar with him after seeing a lot of Saginaw games too. They should feel totally familiar with everyone that’s on the table at 3OA with where we’ve been in the standings all year long

            I agree that Parekh could totally be on the table at 3. But I would absolutely be surprised if they took him there
            csick liked this.
             
            Reply
            To create a post please Login or Register
            Question:
            Options:
            Add Option
            Submit Poll