SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Putting numbers on position for cap hit

Team: 2024-25 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: May 14, 2024
Published: May 14, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This team is not based on skills, it's based on contract value.

Just to show how bad the Cap situation becomes if you overpay too many players on the team you want to build.

You need to balance out the money through your lineup else it's easy to suddenly have a cap crisis.

GMs do have one hell of a job to figure out who to pay high for long vs high short term and figure out their money trail.
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$86,827,857$0$4,150,000$672,143
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,450,000$2,450,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,900,000$5,900,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$918,333$918,333
RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$916,667$916,667
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 14 at 9:42 a.m.
#1
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 719
Likes: 166
This is interesting. I actually think the Bruins have done a pretty good job of building the proper sized core, one high paid forward, one high paid dman, and a good amount of middle of the pack + value guys. Of course their team needs more talent, but the base is arguable there.

Teams like Toronto are screwed, however making lateral moves with their star players shouldn't be too hard.

Makes players like Stamkos and Reinhart, or maybe even Marchessault, seem less likely to return to their teams.
May 14 at 10:28 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 360
I have often thought for years that teams need to have a cap hit for players based on their position in the lineup. Say if a player is on a ELC, then you would be getting great value and have extra money to spend on that line. I know lines change but normally not drastically.
May 14 at 1:44 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Yall gotta Chill
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 203
Quoting: JTrades
I have often thought for years that teams need to have a cap hit for players based on their position in the lineup. Say if a player is on a ELC, then you would be getting great value and have extra money to spend on that line. I know lines change but normally not drastically.


Exactly why I did this. As a Habs fan, when you see Gally and Anderson's contracts, you think they should be on the 2nd line producing.. But hell.. Bergevin screwed those amazingly. Everyone knew Gally was a core HABS player, but not at that price knowing his best days were behind him. Should've just given him a 2 year at 7.5M$ and this way you know he'll be there but if doesn't meet expectations, he can be extended for a very low salary or let go knowing you paid him for those last 4 years he gave you everything. They overpaid by 4 years with that 6 year deal.

If you find a GM that can balance his core player and replace those that are 3rd and 4th liners with lower contracts but give you more defensive style plays, then you have more money up front that you can attract actual top 3 players, then top 2 defense, and still get a good goaler. Your second line can be filled with hybrid grit/scorers/defenders.

Of course some players you can move up and down, such has a 1st overall pick like Bedard, his first three years he'll cost you nothing, so if you invest for 3 years in a bigger player, then you might look into paying a top winger and extra million to ensure he comes over, but still the balancing act is not easy for these GMs.
May 14 at 2:11 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 360
Quoting: WhoCares_ItsAFantasyGame
Exactly why I did this. As a Habs fan, when you see Gally and Anderson's contracts, you think they should be on the 2nd line producing.. But hell.. Bergevin screwed those amazingly. Everyone knew Gally was a core HABS player, but not at that price knowing his best days were behind him. Should've just given him a 2 year at 7.5M$ and this way you know he'll be there but if doesn't meet expectations, he can be extended for a very low salary or let go knowing you paid him for those last 4 years he gave you everything. They overpaid by 4 years with that 6 year deal.

If you find a GM that can balance his core player and replace those that are 3rd and 4th liners with lower contracts but give you more defensive style plays, then you have more money up front that you can attract actual top 3 players, then top 2 defense, and still get a good goaler. Your second line can be filled with hybrid grit/scorers/defenders.

Of course some players you can move up and down, such has a 1st overall pick like Bedard, his first three years he'll cost you nothing, so if you invest for 3 years in a bigger player, then you might look into paying a top winger and extra million to ensure he comes over, but still the balancing act is not easy for these GMs.


I totally agree!
Anderson is a great player that is getting paid too much. pay him 3 million and everyone loves him!. The problem is, when you have a player who is getting paid to much, it limits your options. You end up with a 3rd line player playing on the top line because you are paying a 3rd line player like a 1st line player.

Imagine signing a free agent and being disappointed because they are getting paid too much to play so low in the lineup. You could hold your scouts accountable
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll