SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

LaCombe cost Anaheim fans

Created by: StDetroitBlueWings
Team: 2024-25 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: May 17, 2024
Published: May 17, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What's the cost ANA?

I've seen some trades saying LaCombe + EDM 1st for STL 1st, but was wondering what kind of deal could work out if we kept our 1st.
Trades
STL
  1. LaCombe, Jackson [RFA Rights]
ANA
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Picks? Any players of interest?
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the NYI
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
17$87,700,000$72,057,262$0$0$15,642,738
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,125,000$8,125,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 17 at 10:58 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 814
Likes: 429
I just added the 2nd as a base. Could do a 2nd plus more.

Just anything except our own 1st in case we attempted to trade up
May 17 at 11:28 a.m.
#2
45 for Norris.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 501
Likes: 330
Maybe a Second and a decent foward prospect.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 17 at 11:29 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 814
Likes: 429
Quoting: Manson
Maybe a Second and a decent foward prospect.


2nd + Dylan Peterson or Tanner Dickenson?
May 17 at 11:50 a.m.
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,293
Likes: 26,030
There are some interesting possibilities here. The same pick swap is available in the second round because we have the Boston pick. Also, we're lacking a 2025 second, so yours for our 2025 third is an idea. I think that you would have to add a little in a pick swap. If we're talking about straight value,

Quoting: Manson
Maybe a Second and a decent forward prospect.


Quoting: StDetroitBlueWings
2nd + Dylan Peterson or Tanner Dickenson?

I don't know your team too well, but they might be right. Also, since those two prospects are centers, we'd look at Simon Robertsson and Marcus Sylvegard, because we're thin at RW. I know NOTHING about any of the four of them, so please don't be insulted if I've stumbled on your second-best forward prospect. But I think that LaCombe has definite second-pairing potential.
May 17 at 12:19 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 462
Quoting: OldNYIfan
There are some interesting possibilities here. The same pick swap is available in the second round because we have the Boston pick. Also, we're lacking a 2025 second, so yours for our 2025 third is an idea. I think that you would have to add a little in a pick swap. If we're talking about straight value,




I don't know your team too well, but they might be right. Also, since those two prospects are centers, we'd look at Simon Robertsson and Marcus Sylvegard, because we're thin at RW. I know NOTHING about any of the four of them, so please don't be insulted if I've stumbled on your second-best forward prospect. But I think that LaCombe has definite second-pairing potential.


These seem reasonable.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 17 at 12:27 p.m.
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,469
Likes: 7,270
Edited May 17 at 2:01 p.m.
A later 2nd is probably right at reasonable value, maybe a minor sweetener to get it done, but not much needed. Question comes down to is that a deal Anaheim interested in doing, to which I say it's probably not. There's not really any need for us to keep stacking lotto tickets we've got a pretty good base already.

The trade up option is appealing to us since many of us have our sights set on MBD in the draft. Other options would be to trade him for a middle 6 Right shot forward of appropriate age range, or a middle pairing potential RHD of appropriate age. Sylvegard might be an interesting option.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 17 at 12:53 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 814
Likes: 429
Quoting: OldNYIfan
There are some interesting possibilities here. The same pick swap is available in the second round because we have the Boston pick. Also, we're lacking a 2025 second, so yours for our 2025 third is an idea. I think that you would have to add a little in a pick swap. If we're talking about straight value,




I don't know your team too well, but they might be right. Also, since those two prospects are centers, we'd look at Simon Robertsson and Marcus Sylvegard, because we're thin at RW. I know NOTHING about any of the four of them, so please don't be insulted if I've stumbled on your second-best forward prospect. But I think that LaCombe has definite second-pairing potential.


Quoting: GiggywithGibby
A later 2nd is probably right at reasonable value, maybe a minor sweetener to get it done, but not much needed. Question comes down to is that a deal Anaheim interested in doing, to which I say it's probably not. There's not really any need for us to keep stacking lotto tickets we've got a pretty good base already.

The trade up option is appealing to us since many of us have our rights set on MBD in the draft. Other options would be to trade him for a middle 6 Right shot forward of appropriate age range, or a middle pairing potential RHD of appropriate age. Sylvegard might be an interesting option.


Robertsson most likely considering Sylvegard was just signed. Doubt we would sign him just to immediately trade him away.

I'd even do a 2nd + 3rd for LaCombe if that was interesting. Although I'd rather a lower pick than a 3rd to hopefully still have our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd to attempt to move up to around 10/11
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 17 at 2:06 p.m.
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,469
Likes: 7,270
Quoting: StDetroitBlueWings
Robertsson most likely considering Sylvegard was just signed. Doubt we would sign him just to immediately trade him away.

I'd even do a 2nd + 3rd for LaCombe if that was interesting. Although I'd rather a lower pick than a 3rd to hopefully still have our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd to attempt to move up to around 10/11


Robertson is a pretty uninteresting piece as a 21 year old that got demoted from the SHL to the second league, seems like he'll never play in the show, and at that point we'd be giving LaCombe away, at least Sylvegard looks like he'll play in the NHL with some success.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll