DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
6
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
BigE
Go Jets, Go Hawks
Member Since
May 25, 2018
Forum Posts
333
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 9, 2023 at 10:49 a.m.
Thread:
Laff Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>This won't get it done, but it's worth a conversation with Drury.</div></div>
What about the 20th pick? I thought that might be a bit too much, hence the 2nd and the 4th. Or the 35th and 56th pick?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 4, 2023 at 10:05 a.m.
Thread:
trying to keep everyone no kane or vladdy but it will have to do
Alexis gets an offer sheet at that salary - it's only a 2nd rounder as compensation....
You are also forgetting that the Rangers will likely have performance bonus overages that will reduce the total cap for them next year....Its likely their cap will be closer to 81 million....so this just isn't going to work.....You cannot keep both Laf and K'andre without trading Kreider of Trockeck.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 4, 2023 at 9:55 a.m.
Thread:
Just proof for a comment
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GM69</b></div><div>no, but there was a challenge that you couldn't get Laffy/Miller to 4.2m deals without making any trade.</div></div>
You do realize the Rangers have $3,700,000 in potential bonuses that will come out of next years salary cap, right? The Rangers will be lucky to have 80-81 Million in total cap space available.....which is one of the RFA signings.....You won't be able to sign both without trading Trocheck or Kreider...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 4, 2023 at 9:49 a.m.
Thread:
habs rangers pt 1
For 2.2 million I can almost guarantee you the Hawks offer him 3+ million in an offer sheet and give up a 2nd rounder for him as compensation. The Rangers will need to find a way to offer him over $4,201,489 so the comp is a 1st and a 3rd or they will lose him. Same with K'Andre....Signing both will cost the Rangers a minimum of 8.4M+ combined...You guys are screwed...Shoot, the Hawks could offer sheet them both at 4.2 million and put the Rangers in a bad spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3, 2023 at 4:33 p.m.
Thread:
1 overall traded to Vancouver
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Fixed that for you</div></div>
Haha, I am a Blackhawk fan, but I wanted to model a trade that was similar to the Lindros trade and see what it came to from a Cap perspective - then decided to publish it. The Lindros trade of course was pre-cap days. This trade is ridiculous, but it is similar (despite a reply suggesting that Vancouver is giving up more), which is ludicrous. Of course, Bedard would be worth more to Vancouver than just about anyone else because he will sell out the arena for years to come being a hometown kid. With that said, the interesting question is, in a realistic trade scenario (given the teams actually get the draft position their standings currently dictate), the 2 1st's have to stay (1 of them being a swap this year)....I still think the Hawks would get 2 of the 3 from Boesser, Petterrson, and Hughes, no? So would Vancouver fans say yes to Boesser, Hughes, and 2 1st? I feel like that is more than fair, perhaps not enough...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 27, 2021 at 3:21 p.m.
Thread:
MAF traded to Pitt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RicXX</b></div><div>I could see either of those trades, but I think it will have to be 1st's to retain... or 2 2nds. I think just the 2nd is a little low.</div></div>
or a 2nd and a mid-level prospect?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 27, 2021 at 3:20 p.m.
Thread:
Jets trade swap picks
Thought I would come back to the thread, I forgot about it but was trying to figure out what the Hawks are going to do with Strome and it popped in my head.....I just read an article that states Lundell may have had one of the best seasons of anyone not in the NHL. The Hawks never bought out Smith (as I rightly predicted).
As for Strome, there isn't a team in the league that would trade a 1st for him now....and I don't think any team would trade a 2nd for him unless the Hawks retain salary. That trade with Winnipeg would have at least resulted in a great future in goal for the Hawks, I'm not sold on Lankinen and clearly, neither are the Hawks with today's events...
Reading through this thread, I may have gone a bit too far....sorry for any name calling, ChiHawk.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Seriously, stop the name calling. There are rules on the forums here and heavily enforced to keep this for adults to have healthy discussions and healthy debates which doesn't involve name calling. You may not agree with me and clearly i don't with your viewpoint, but in life in general when you resort to name calling it shows 1) immaturity and 2) weakness in your position; this is debate 101 stuff.
Ask all the Hawks fans on here, and there are 3 of us who are known to be the most knowledgeable about this team, that is what I said not the entire AGM forum so take it down a notch please.
Strome played 78 games last season at the age of 21. He missed 4 games when he was with AZ last season but played 100% of the games when he was a Blackhawk. Prior to last season, Arizona didn't play him a lot and mismanaged his development (AZ is known to do that) as evident of the success he's had since getting traded. The first injury he faced was this season and it was a week and a 1/2. Later he missed another week due to the flu. Strome does not have a injury history and one minor isolated incident does not take away from his value. Google is your friend.
In the last 2 seasons at the age of 21 and 22, he's put up .70ppg...that's pretty damn good and certainly worth a 1st round pick for a 2C, RFA who recently turned 23. A good comparison, for two similar centers potentially on the market is Cerelli and Domi. In the last two seasons...Cirelli = .55ppg (same age), Domi = .75ppg (age 25)
Your knocks against Strome starting in the offensive zone is a weak debate. Some of the greatest players in the league, make most of their starts in the offensive zone. Kane, Matthews, Marner, Laine, McDavid, etc. What's your point? The guy is a offensive player just like many big time guys who put up a ton of points. It's not a secret Strome is not very good defensively, it's like you pretend you just found the secret to how the earth was made. Good Lord guy
As for Lundell, The Athletic featured an article this morning on the most polarizing draft picks in the 1st round and featured ONLY 2 scout comments for each player; 1 scout high on the player and 1 scout low on the player. You should spend the $12 a year for some good insights into hockey and especially what the 2 most respected Hawks analysts have to say about the Hawks fans, buyouts and value of trades. Lundell has a 2C ceiling and a 3C floor, in other words low risk gamble despite what the scout in The Athletic said. Lundell is a defensive first player and doesn't have a lot of offense to his game despite a great wrister. He's not a very fast skater either. Those are the knocks against Lundell which is why he easily can be a 3C. If he can improve his speed and put together more offense then he'll be a 2C. It's a gamble either way you look at Lundell if what you absolutely need is a 2C. Why do you think so many Jets fans on here are trying to acquire Strome or Cerelli when it's pretty obvious lundell will be available at the #10 spot? Maybe because they realize, despite being the most NHL ready player in the top 12 of the draft, he has quite a bit of work if he's going to be a 3C.
You're the only person, professional analysts included, I've heard say the Hawks won't buy out Smith and move big assets to trade him. Maybe you're right or maybe you're an audience of one arguing something you're completely wrong on; time will tell. Bottom line, the Hawks are cornered on the cap nearly as much as you are trying to make it sound.
We'll gladly keep Strome, not trade him to move up 7 spots in the draft, and throw a 1 year qualifying offer at him or a 2 year $3.5M deal. If a team offer sheets him, Hawks match up to $4.3M at which point the Hawks gladly take a first and 3rd and move on.
Have a nice day.</div></div>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29, 2021 at 12:48 p.m.
Thread:
Draft and Offseason
You have the Hawks trading for Nolan Patrick but then not signing him? Also, I'd rather trade Keith than Murphy...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14, 2021 at 7:47 a.m.
Thread:
Next years trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Canoehead</b></div><div>At next year's trade deadline, you might have to ask Seattle for Appleton, not Winnipeg.</div></div>
That's a good point and there are a number of Jets that Seattle could take. The Hawks may be able to get more than Appleton for Zadarov anyway.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14, 2021 at 7:44 a.m.
Thread:
Next years trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>VGKNation702</b></div><div>I mean AtLeast you guys have finally pivoted off of Tuch for Strome lol</div></div>
I was never one of those guys, in fact, I got into arguments on here about the over-valuing of Strome that other Hawks fans have.....I wanted the Hawks to trade Strome to Winnipeg the last draft just to switch draft positions in the 1st round so the Hawks could take Askarov....I was called crazy for suggesting it, that Strome was worth that pick by himself.....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13, 2021 at 5:48 p.m.
Thread:
Next years trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>It could be Chicago just as much as Calgary though too.</div></div>
I suppose the Hawks could be in contention, but I think this D needs another year of suffering before it grows up. Keith playing big minutes for the Hawks beyond next year could hamper that progression. This team as build here could make some serious noise the year after next...
But you make a good point, if this team in 2022 is going to make the playoffs, keeping Keith would be fine....you could always trade him in the offseason with just the year left on his contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13, 2021 at 4:40 p.m.
Thread:
throwing something and seeing if it will stick
I think there is 0 chance the Hawks give up Murphy for that little. He has become a leader on that D and with Keith likely gone soon enough, he will become the elder veteran back there with a very young blue line. His advanced stats are way better than his point totals, and if you just watch him play you'll quickly realize he probably is a top 50 defenceman in the NHL right now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13, 2021 at 4:26 p.m.
Thread:
Next years trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gmonwy</b></div><div>What makes you think Calgary will be a contender?</div></div>
eh, it really could be any contender...I just picked Calgary out of the hat.....could be Toronto or Winnipeg....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13, 2021 at 4:25 p.m.
Thread:
Next season
If Bowman traded Murphy I would be really surprised....You have a better chance of getting Keith at the deadline for some combination of picks...and the Hawks will likely retain cap to do it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13, 2021 at 3:55 p.m.
Thread:
Off-Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYR1983</b></div><div>His term wouldn’t fit.. if he is a rental and we have injuries then your theory works. But not for 2 years of contract.</div></div>
It really wouldn't be for 2 years if it's a trade deadline deal next year, which is what I'm talking about....and of course, the Hawks would need to cover up to 1/2 of the Cap hit...which shouldn't be a big deal. The point I'm trying to make is he is likely to be traded but not this offseason....at the tradeline next year, Keith would only count minimally the remainder of the year and only about 2.75 Million the following year (50% salary retained). You aren't getting that quality a defenceman in free agency at that price, unless Keith completely regresses, which is possible. I think Keith is minimally worth a 2nd rounder and probably more next year if he is still eating up 23 minutes a game of quality defense...I agree the trade proposed here is unlikely.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13, 2021 at 11:21 a.m.
Thread:
Off-Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYR1983</b></div><div>Ya, if retained 50% to a contender in need of a D man, sure. NYR isn’t the right destination. TOR with double retention might be the fit</div></div>
Next year at the trade deadline, if the Rangers are in contention and Trouba gets injured the Rangers could be a team looking for D. In the offseason, not so much...but in season, anything can happen and a guy like Keith with his playoff experience would be very valuable....of course, if he can maintain his level of play and doesn't experience a huge drop-off.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13, 2021 at 9:08 a.m.
Thread:
Off-Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYR1983</b></div><div>0 need for a D man. All our rookies will be in place by fall. Keith is a bad contract that you would have to pay someone to take by the way.</div></div>
I'd normally agree with you, but Keith is still a very serviceable, minute-eating defenceman. After this year, there are only 2 years left and that contract isn't bad at all...Next year, he's the 38th highest-paid defenceman in the league (likely to be in the 40's after free agency). Also, his actual salary for the next 2 years is really low (3.6 million combined for the 2 years). I don't believe he gets traded in the off-season, because frankly, who's going to eat up his minutes? Next year at the deadline is a very real possibility, and if the Hawks eat 1/2 of his cap the return for him could be substantial from a contending team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 8, 2021 at 2:21 p.m.
Thread:
Healthy Hawks Next Season
Someone in this lineup is likely to be playing for Seattle next year. Hagel maybe??
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 9, 2020 at 4:02 p.m.
Thread:
New Goalie Options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>And I suppose all the doctors are Honest Abe. The source is The Athletic which is the most respected source for hockey.</div></div>
Again, the player doesn't bring the doctor... the team has to..... the players have 0 to do with themselves being on ltir, specifically off- season. You really need to take what you read with a grain of salt, including the athletic. The very preposition that a player can make himself stay on ltir so as not to get bought out is ludicrous....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 9, 2020 at 10:47 a.m.
Thread:
Down year sell off vets
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stan_Bowman</b></div><div>Even though Kane is a world class player, he will eventually age, and there’s no reason for Buffalo to trade Eichel for him.</div></div>
Unless Eichel wants out? BTW, I know this is crazy talk... just throwing it out there...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 9, 2020 at 10:44 a.m.
Thread:
New Goalie Options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>I don't know what you don't understand but LITR players can be bought out. It is speculated that Smith used that to his advantage knowing he would likely be bought out.</div></div>
BTW, players don't determine if they stay on LTIR... and off-season LTIR require doctors sign off that a player will still be injured the beginning of the season..... whomever your sources are, please start questioning them, as Smith couldn't use LTIR to his advantage in any way....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 9, 2020 at 10:40 a.m.
Thread:
Down year sell off vets
If you are going this route, why not entice Buffalo with Kane to get Eichel who wants out of there anyway? Since you'd have Eichel and Dach then, Toews also becomes expendable... all unlikely, I know, but why not try?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 8, 2020 at 1:24 p.m.
Thread:
New Goalie Options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Zach Smith can't be bought out as he is still on LITR and the CBA prohibits a buyout for players on LITR. The deadline passed at 11am for buyouts. Zach Smith likely remained on LITR through the buyout period to protect himself from a buyout.</div></div>
But, but, but..all your experts said he was gonna get bought out, even though the Hawks never use buyouts...hmmm....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 8, 2020 at 1:19 p.m.
Thread:
New Goalie Options
BTW, today is the last day for buyouts, and a player must be on waivers for 24 hours to be bought out....we've heard neither for Zach Smith....so I don't believe he's getting bought out....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 25, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
Thread:
What it would actually take for Laine
Yeah, I actuality think the Jets would consider this if that 2020 1st pick is the 7th OA.
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com