SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Campabee

Member Since
Nov. 3, 2018
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Carolina Hurricanes
Forum Posts
15832
Posts per Day
7.8
Forum: Armchair-GM19 hours ago
Forum: Armchair-GM22 hours ago
Forum: Armchair-GM23 hours ago
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fergy72</b></div><div>Ken Holland traded away every 1st rounder and had plenty of bad contracts not to mention he decimated the entire farm system, our AHL team was like 28 year old average. you can't rebuild an organization in 5 drafts. this was the 1st season where the AHL team had plenty of yzerman's draft picks. he hasn't been perfect but this is why teams shouldn't always go for it every year. You probably weren't complaining about all those horrible deals Holland made the last 5 years of his tenure to keep the streak going. This is a true rebuild in every sense of the word and they take 8-10 years especially without a #1 overall pick</div></div>

If it takes 8-10 years to rebuild a team in today's NHL you are doing it very wrong. It should take a max of 5 years, first two years should be the sell off aquiring as many 1sts and 2nds as possible and finishing in the top 5-10 of the draft. Next 2 years should be the development years (finishing 10-16th in the draft) each year building on the next with your top prospects already securing roster spots. Final year is the filling out of the roster, signing FA's, trading for veteran leaders with playoff experience (preferably former cup winners) and proven playoff preformers. This 5th year should be the first taste of the playoffs either as a WC team or 3rd place divisional leader. The prospects are so close in skill these days and the development departments invest so much time and money that it no longer takes a prospect 4-5 years to be NHL ready, even lower round picks start taking roster spots in the first 3 years now.
Forum: Armchair-GM24 hours ago